BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UM//UM*Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Detroit
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/America/Detroit
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Detroit
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20070311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20071104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20190326T081356
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20190329T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20190329T170000
SUMMARY:Lecture / Discussion:Ancient Philosophy: Mariska Leunissen (UNC Chapel Hill)
DESCRIPTION:For Aristotle\, every scientific investigation starts with the collection and organization of facts: only once we have established the 'hotis' - the 'thats' - of any given scientific domain\, we can then proceed to investigate their causes and provide explanations or demonstrations of those facts. The fact collecting stage in Aristotle's natural sciences is thoroughly empirical: Aristotle stresses the importance of acquiring observational experience\, of observing phenomena for the sake of knowledge\, and of giving credence to observations over theory in cases where the facts have not yet been sufficiently grasped. My aim in this paper is to reconstruct and critically discuss (1) Aristotle's strategies for establishing facts in his natural sciences in those cases where observations are altogether lacking or insufficient to determine with any certainty whether the facts are such or so (e.g. 'whether the universe is spherical or lentil-shaped' in his cosmology\, or 'whether the gestation period of elephants is one years or two years long' in his biology) and (2) also his strategies for evaluating putative empirical facts as reported by others in those cases where Aristotle would not have been able to verify those facts himself through observation. I will argue that in empirically underdetermined domains\, Aristotle's epistemic goal in establishing facts is not knowledge but credence\, and that he relies heavily on circumstantial empirical evidence\; on arguments based on 'what can reasonably be expected to be the case'\, given observations of other\, related phenomena\; and on ingenious methods of 'weighing' the evidential force of competing sets of inconclusive observations in an attempt to establish and evaluate natural facts in a scientific way.
UID:60924-14988682@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/60924
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Classical Studies,Philosophy
LOCATION:Angell Hall - Tanner Library (Room 1171)
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR