BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UM//UM*Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Detroit
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/America/Detroit
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Detroit
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20070311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20071104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20230831T103253
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20230901T160000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20230901T173000
SUMMARY:Lecture / Discussion:CSAS Lecture | Genealogies of Knowledge Production: Information\, Data\, and Algorithmic World-Making
DESCRIPTION:Genealogies of Knowledge Production:\n   Information\, Data\, and Algorithmic World-Making\n   \n   Current controversies about Artificial Intelligence (AI)\, ranging from the future of work\, healthcare and the economy to surveillance and privacy\, national sovereignty\, and\, indeed\, human survival\, are deeply implicated in constructions of futurity. Many critiques of AI and algorithms center on questions of bias: the implication is that if the data encoded in algorithms was unbiased we could be assured of a more just future. While the concerns underlying these critiques are valid\, most anxieties about bias frame the problem too narrowly. Such critiques also deal inadequately with the imbrication of AI and algorithms with culture\, history\, and politics.\n   \n   What happens when we reframe the story of information\, Big Data and\, hence\, algorithms from the perspective of the Global South? In this talk\, I focus on two sites in postcolonial India: the role of information in development projects\, and the launch of the Aadhar project. My aim is to diagram a theoretical framework that moves away from universalist and singular narratives of information\, data\, and algorithms by proposing postcolonial and conjunctural accounts. Such accounts push back against the naturalization of information as self-evident and as a “thing” that can be disseminated\, transferred\, or produced as an object in order to assert its imbrication of in larger genealogies of knowledge production imbricated in coloniality\, empire\, nationalism\, and neoliberalism. I also argue for mining the glitch and the workaround or jugaad as opportunities for potentially interrupting statist and neoliberal projects of the informatization of social formations. I conclude by ruminating on what these accounts suggest about futurity as an affective-temporal regime.\n   \nTrained as a cultural anthropologist\, Purnima Mankekar has conducted interdisciplinary research on television\, film\, and digital media\, and on publics/public cultures with a focus on the politics of affect. She is completing a book on affective labor and the production of futurities in the Business Process Outsourcing industry in Bengaluru\, India titled Future Tense: Affective Labor and Disjunctive Temporalities (co-authored with Akhil Gupta). Her new ethnographic project is on the sociopolitical implications of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in India.\n   \nHer teaching interests include digital and “virtual” anthropology\; theories of affect\; feminist anthropology and ethnography\; postcolonial and women of color feminism\; anthropological approaches to sexuality\, queer theory\, and queer of color critique\; and Asian American and South Asian Studies.\n\n*Made possible with the generous support of the Title VI grant from the U.S. Department of Education. *
UID:109909-21823220@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/109909
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Asia,gender studies
LOCATION:Weiser Hall - Room 110
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR