BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UM//UM*Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Detroit
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/America/Detroit
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Detroit
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20070311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20071104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260828T120810
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20260911T133000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20260911T150000
SUMMARY:Workshop / Seminar:When Crime Pays the Victim: How Victim Policy Shaped the Carceral State
DESCRIPTION:From prisons to policing to the courts\, scholars have documented the far-reaching scope of inequality in the criminal legal system. Yet we have largely missed a critical piece of the story: the social welfare policies ostensibly intended to benefit crime victims. Existing accounts treat victims’ relationship to punishment as rhetorical\, a story of ideology or movement mobilization. My book-in-progress\, a case study of the history and implementation of victim compensation law\, shows how resources for victims are structurally tied to punishment\, as well. Liberal Democrats in the 1960s proposed victim compensation to offset their weaknesses in crime politics\, but conservatives objected to a new social program funded by “taxpayer” money. The solution\, discovered largely by accident in California\, was to finance compensation through mandatory criminal fines—making resources for victims dependent on more criminal convictions. After determining who would pay for victim benefits\, lawmakers decided whose victimization would pay. Compensation was limited to victims who reported crimes\, cooperated with police\, and were not “criminals” themselves—criteria that also penalize survivors of domestic violence. Today\, victims of color\, especially Black men\, are most likely to be denied compensation because the police perceive them as uncooperative or to blame for their victimization. The result is racially regressive redistribution: people of color disproportionately fund victim benefits through criminal fines and are more likely to be denied the benefit because they are perceived as “criminals.” I make the case for placing victim policy alongside prisons and police\, with implications for how we understand inequality\, the state\, and the political economy of punishment.
UID:151094-21910860@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/151094
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Legal Systems,Organizational Studies,Sociology
LOCATION:Ross School of Business - R2240
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260827T124854
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20260918T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20260918T150000
SUMMARY:Workshop / Seminar:The Specter of Discrimination: Employment-Contingent Mobility and the Anticipatory Recognition of Racism among Black Tech Professionals
DESCRIPTION:Workplace discrimination in professional occupations remains an important mechanism through which racial inequality is reproduced. Yet existing research tends to conceptualize discrimination through identifiable incidents or interactions\, leaving less understood how workers experience racialized treatment that is diffuse\, cumulative\, or difficult to translate into institutionally recognizable terms. In order to fill this gap\, this research draws on 140 in-depth interviews with college-educated Black professionals to investigate how workers perceive\, interpret\, and respond to racialized treatment in professional workplaces. Findings reveal a striking uncertainty among participants regarding assessments of discrimination and their broader accounts of workplace life. While participants described racialized comments\, differential evaluations\, heightened scrutiny\, exclusion\, disproportionate workloads\, and other forms of differential treatment that accumulated across interactions and organizational processes\, they often did so without producing a singular incident they considered sufficiently consequential\, provable\, or reportable as discrimination. Notably\, 35% of these accounts came from individuals who had reported experiencing little or no discrimination in a pre-interview survey. I conceptualize this diffuse organizational presence as the specter of discrimination: the pervasive sense that race structures how one is perceived and treated at work even when its effects cannot always be located within a singular\, discrete discriminatory event. The specter generates racialized interpretive and vigilant labor as workers scrutinize interactions and organizational decisions\, assess their cumulative implications\, anticipate future treatment\, and\, at times\, question whether what they experienced was racial discrimination at all. By shifting analytical attention from discrimination as a discrete event to racialization as an organizational presence that is experienced cumulatively across workplace life\, this study expands sociological understandings of how racial inequality is perceived\, navigated\, and reproduced in contemporary professional workplaces.
UID:151024-21910735@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/151024
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Interdisciplinary,Organizational Studies,Sociology Department,Icos
LOCATION:Ross School of Business - R2240
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260828T131056
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20260925T133000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20260925T150000
SUMMARY:Workshop / Seminar:Private Actors\, Public Governance: Policy Signals\, Managerial Agency\, and Corporate Climate Action
DESCRIPTION:When do corporate climate commitments translate into substantive emissions reductions rather than remaining symbolic? This study draws on a multilevel political economy framework: corporate climate action depends on both bottom-up managerial agency and top-down regulatory signals. Using panel data on large U.S. publicly traded firms\, the study examines how managerial agency and organizational capabilities—reflected in dedicated leadership\, environmental commitments\, and innovation capacity—interact with external policy pressures. A quasi-experimental design compares firms facing differing regulatory pressure across hard-to-abate and consumer-oriented sectors\, isolating the separate and joint roles of policy threats and managerial agency. Stronger policy signals increase firm participation in climate disclosure programs across sectors\, but reduce emissions intensity only when firms possess managerial capabilities. This decarbonization channel is strongest in hard-to-abate sectors where regulatory pressure is most direct\, whereas consumer-oriented sectors exhibit less substantive\, more symbolic responses. These findings show that managerial agency and organizational capabilities do not operate in a vacuum\, but are activated and reinforced by external policy signals. By identifying the conditions under which private actors convert internal and external institutional pressures into real decarbonization\, this study offers large-scale empirical evidence on when multilevel governance—spanning regulatory\, voluntary\, and organizational mechanisms—effectively drives corporate climate action.
UID:151119-21910884@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/151119
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Public Governance,Sociology,Organizational Studies,Corporate Climate
LOCATION:Ross School of Business - R2240
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260901T150549
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20260929T173000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20260929T190000
SUMMARY:Presentation:OS Info Night F26
DESCRIPTION:OS is an interdisciplinary major based in the social sciences where students customize their own education. Enjoy a small community of dedicated and ambitious students with access to top-notch faculty and an engaged alumni network. At Info Night\, you'll hear from the Program Director\, Major Advisors\, Current OS students\, and OS alumni. Topics covered include curriculum\, admissions\, and career/graduate study options.
UID:151248-21911152@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/151248
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Majors,Org Studies,Organizational Studies,Os,Sessions,Undergraduate Students
LOCATION:260 Weiser
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260828T131627
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20261002T133000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20261002T150000
SUMMARY:Workshop / Seminar:Reconceiving Merit and Devotion at Work\, with Evidence-Based Illustrations from Academic Careers
DESCRIPTION:Reconceiving Merit and Devotion at Work\, with Evidence-Based Illustrations from Academic Careers\n\nThis paper draws on research to argue that the cultural schema of work devotion – the cognitive\, emotional and moral understanding of work as a calling and an ostensible marker of merit– promises a workplace community and a sense of purpose. These rewards are consistent with the biological propensity for social connections\, which can help protect our physical and mental health. However\, the benefits of work devotion are not equally available to all socio-demographic groups. Further\, the work devotion mandate can feel coercive\, justify overwork\, deplete engagement with family and community\, and lead to moral distress. The paper presents evidence from the exemplar case of academic science to illustrate how small\, locally led changes in the department\, framed as consistent with professional values of merit and devotion\, could allow scholars to benefit more equally from the work devotion schema while also mitigating some of its detriments.
UID:151122-21910889@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/151122
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Devotion,Merit,Organizational Studies,Sociology
LOCATION:Ross School of Business - R2240
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260828T130114
DTSTART;TZID=America/Detroit:20261211T133000
DTEND;TZID=America/Detroit:20261211T150000
SUMMARY:Workshop / Seminar:The Role of Young Firms as Employers of Marginalized Workers
DESCRIPTION:Young firms have long been known to be important drivers of job creation\, yet little is known about how and who these firms hire. We provide new evidence that they are disproportionate employers of a largely “unemployable” group: individuals with criminal records. Using administrative data on U.S. workers\, firms\, and the criminal justice system\, we show that young firms struggle to compete for labor against established firms and subsequently hire disproportionately from people with criminal records.  Following a criminal conviction\, a worker becomes 21% more likely to take a job at a young firm. We show this pattern reflects firm-side constraints rather than worker or young firm preferences: young firms conduct fewer background checks and draw from a residual pool of workers that established firms have screened out. Consistent with this mechanism\, sorting is substantially stronger for heavily stigmatized offenses\, weaker in tight labor markets where established firms lower their screening standards\, and weaker under Ban-the-Box policies that restrict established firms’ ability to screen. Using a Bartik instrument\, we show that counties with more jobs at young firms see higher employment rates for workers with criminal records but no change in recidivism\, suggesting these jobs expand labor market access for these workers\, but may not produce the stability needed to deter re-offending.
UID:151118-21910883@events.umich.edu
URL:https://events.umich.edu/event/151118
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED
CATEGORIES:Organizational Studies,Criminal Justice,Bartik
LOCATION:Ross School of Business - R2440
CONTACT:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR